IRS filing season is open. File your IRS for free (early access) →
descodify
← Back to blog

Running a solo business in Portugal and Sweden: two systems, different trade-offs.

By Mikael

Last year, my accountant submitted my IRS return and I only reviewed the numbers after the fact. Several thousand euros had been added back to my gross income because I hadn't proven enough deductible expenses on the e-fatura portal. I didn't even know I needed to.

I'd been on the simplified regime for three years, operating under the assumption that the automatic 25% expense deduction meant I didn't need to worry about tracking receipts. Turns out, you still need to prove 15% of your gross income in documented expenses, classified correctly on the e-fatura system. Miss that threshold, and the shortfall gets added back to your taxable income.

This wasn't my accountant's fault. It was a gap in how we communicated. There was no shared dashboard, no checklist of what I needed to do before filing season. The information existed on both sides but there was no tool connecting us. I never corrected the return. Resubmitting would have taken hours I could have spent invoicing clients. So I paid the extra tax and moved on.

That experience got me thinking about the differences between running a business here and in Sweden, where I'm from. I've started and run businesses in Sweden, Germany, and now Portugal. Some stayed small. Others grew into multi-country operations across the Nordics. In every case, the ability to understand your own numbers and control costs was what separated the businesses that worked from the ones that didn't.

Not in a "one country is better" way. Both systems have real strengths and blind spots. But they solve the same problem from opposite directions, and the contrast is worth understanding if you're building a business in either country.

Where Portugal gets it right

Portugal does more to encourage people to start businesses than most of Europe. Definitely more than Sweden.

When you register as a trabalhador independente (independent worker), you get a 12-month exemption from Social Security contributions. Your income tax is reduced by 50% in the first year, 25% in the second. If you're under 35, the IRS Jovem program extends tax reductions for up to ten years.

The simplified regime itself is a genuine advantage. The tax authority assumes 25% of your service income goes to expenses and only taxes you on the remaining 75%. You don't need to maintain full double-entry bookkeeping. No mandatory auditor. No requirement to hire a certified accountant. For a solo entrepreneur earning under €200,000 per year, the financial barrier to starting is low and the first two years are actively subsidized.

Sweden offers none of this. A sole trader (enskild firma) pays full rates from day one. No first-year tax break. No Social Security holiday. No assumed expense deduction. You register your business and start paying.

Where Sweden gets it right

Sweden's advantage isn't in incentives. It's in the daily experience of running a business once you've started.

The biggest difference is the annual tax return. In Sweden, your deklaration arrives pre-filled. Skatteverket (the tax authority) already has your income data from employers and banks, your deductions from mortgage providers, your interest from savings accounts. You open the app, review the numbers, and confirm by SMS. Five minutes, most years. The system works for you.

In Portugal, you file actively. You validate expenses on the e-fatura portal. You submit quarterly Social Security declarations. You do your annual IRS return yourself. The Portal das Finanças is functional and the Chave Móvel Digital authentication works well, but the process asks more of you.

This year will be my first time doing my own Portuguese declaration from start to finish. I'm looking forward to it, actually. I'll be in control of what gets submitted. But the contrast with tapping "approve" on my phone in Sweden is real.

The other place Sweden shines is small business software. Fortnox and Bokio, the two dominant platforms, automate bookkeeping to the point where most sole traders rarely think about accounting. You invoice through the software, email or photograph your receipts, and the system categorizes and books them. Since July 2024, Swedish law lets you throw away the paper receipt after scanning it. Norway had this for years before Sweden caught up, so even within the Nordics there's variation. But the shared direction is the same: make admin disappear into the software.

The assumed expenses catch

The simplified regime's expense deduction illustrates how Portugal's system can be generous and confusing at the same time.

The idea is elegant: assume 25% of your income is business expenses, don't make freelancers keep detailed books. If you earn €40,000, the tax authority treats €10,000 as expenses and taxes you on €30,000. No receipts needed for that assumed portion.

But you still need to prove 15% of your gross income in documented expenses on the e-fatura system. On €40,000, that's €6,000 in receipts with your NIF, properly categorized as professional expenses. Your Social Security contributions count toward this, and there's an automatic specific deduction of about €4,104 that helps. But depending on your income level, you may still need to actively collect and validate receipts to hit the floor.

So you end up tracking expenses anyway. Every software subscription, every coworking space payment needs your NIF on the receipt and needs to appear correctly on e-fatura. The deduction is real and valuable. It's just not as automatic as it sounds when you first hear about it.

Nobody explained this to me when I started. I don't think it's explained well to most people. You find out when the numbers on your tax return don't match what you expected.

Two political traditions, two approaches

Sweden and Portugal are more politically similar than you'd think. Both countries had long stretches of social-democratic governance. Both have strong labor protections and a genuine belief that the state should provide a safety net.

The difference is what happened in Sweden in the early 1990s. A severe financial crisis forced a set of reforms, supported by both left and right, that combined the social safety net with a strong market focus. The Social Democrats didn't resist this. They participated. The result, three decades later, is a country where the state takes care of a lot (healthcare, parental leave, pensions) but designs business administration to be as frictionless as possible.

Portugal's political history doesn't have that same crisis-driven consensus moment around business admin. But Portugal has its own strengths: the willingness to create real financial incentives for new entrepreneurs, a simplified tax regime that genuinely reduces complexity for small businesses, and a digital infrastructure (Portal das Finanças, e-fatura, Chave Móvel Digital) that works as a solid foundation.

Every country has its quirks. I ran a business in Germany for eight years and can confirm that German bureaucracy is its own special experience. Sweden requires all businesses to keep proper books, even sole traders. The Nordic social model means high tax rates across the board, with no special breaks for small businesses. And Swedish bureaucracy has its own frustrations. Ask anyone who's dealt with Bolagsverket (the Companies Registration Office) about processing times, or tried to navigate the rules around employer contributions (arbetsgivaravgifter) for the first time.

Growing from solo to company

One area where I notice the gap most is the transition from solo entrepreneur to a formal company. In Portugal, the jump from the simplified regime to an LDA (Sociedade por Quotas, roughly equivalent to a limited company) is steep. You move from doing your own admin to needing organized accounting (contabilidade organizada) and a certified accountant. It's a different world.

I hear from both expats and Portuguese entrepreneurs that it works fine if you let the accountant handle everything. Send them your receipts and invoices, they take care of the rest. And for many people that's the right setup. But having run businesses in three countries and scaled operations across the Nordics, I know that staying close to the numbers is what keeps a business healthy. You can't control costs you can't see. You can't make good decisions from quarterly reports you don't fully understand.

I'd prefer a model where I can follow along in real time and have the accountant review and advise rather than operate in a silo. The issue isn't accountant quality. It's that the tools for transparent collaboration between entrepreneurs and their accountants barely exist.

In Sweden, small companies under the audit threshold (roughly SEK 3 million revenue, fewer than 3 employees) don't need an auditor. The accounting software handles most compliance. You can run a proper limited company yourself and bring in a professional only when you need guidance. It scales with you.

I haven't made the jump to a Portuguese company yet. I might be surprised when I do. But the perception from the outside, based on conversations with people who've done it, is that there's a missing middle ground. Software that lets an entrepreneur stay informed and in control while giving their accountant the structured data they need to do their job efficiently. Not replacing the accountant. Connecting both sides.

What each could learn

If I could take the best of both systems:

From Portugal: the simplified regime's financial incentives. Sweden should look at how first-year benefits and assumed expense deductions lower the barrier for new entrepreneurs. Not every small business needs the full weight of the tax system from day one.

From Sweden: the philosophy that admin should be the system's problem, not the business owner's. Pre-fill returns. Let software handle compliance automatically. Make the default path the easy path.

Both countries want small businesses to succeed. Portugal shows it with incentives. Sweden shows it with infrastructure. The ideal is both.

One more place where Portugal is further along than most expats realise: going paperless. I mentioned Sweden's 2024 scan-and-bin rule and Norway's earlier adoption above. Portugal has allowed the same since 2019, under Decreto-Lei 28/2019. The 10-year invoice retention rule still applies, but you do not need a paper box. Scan, back up to a cloud that maintains version history, and discard the originals. The full mechanics are in how long do you need to keep invoices in Portugal, and can you go paperless?

If you're a solo entrepreneur in Portugal navigating the admin side, our tax calculator shows you what you'll actually owe in your first three years, and the VAT guide walks you through which rate and exemption code applies to your situation.

Descodify handles invoicing, VAT, and IRS reporting so you can focus on your work.

Try Descodify free

Working for yourself in Portugal - monthly

Invoicing, VAT, Social Security, expenses, and tax, explained simply. One email a month.